You must know that dismissal is the most serious punishment for a public servant, and it directly deprives a person of his right to continue serving in public office. However, not only the author who is writing the article, tens of thousands of police officers and even experts and scholars have publicly spoken out, all harboring the same doubts: For a police officer who only made improper speeches and did not break the law, wouldn't the Police Department's attack this time be too heavy? Although the public information of the Police Administration did not mention the legal basis for the dismissal of two major demerits at one time, it is inseparable from the "Public Service Performance Appraisal Law".
Article 12, Subparagraph 3, Subparagraph 5 of the Act: "Those who seek unlawful interests or misdeeds, causing serious damage to the reputation of the whatsapp list government or public servants, and there is solid evidence." I am afraid that is the reason cited by the Police Administration. The Police Department said that the Aviation Police Bureau originally gave Chen a demerit and was transferred.
The disparity between the two punishments is worlds apart. The police administration’s statement, in addition to deceiving outsiders, can’t be concealed from the eyes of the grassroots: this matter makes it clear that the police administration itself is unwilling to give up and instructed the aviation police to give dismissed. Since the Police Department is so intolerable for "severely hurting the image of the police", I am puzzled: In April 2017, police officer Zhang Bojun crashed into seven vehicles while driving under the influence of alcohol, injuring six people and intending to hit and run.